Friend, should you ever wish for me to read anything you write beyond the first sentence, may I recommend you don't characterize someone unknown to you as a 'hater'. Only weak people use received opinion to influence others. I may try a subsequent post of your's. But should you begin by telling me what someone else is thinking or feeling or even doing and we part our short, almost acquaintance. Good day
Thank you for writing. This is not "received opinion," it is observational and based on the facts in evidence. I hope you'll go back over some posts from the last year and get a sense of what and how I write. If you find it inadequate, I trust you will unsubscribe, but I think you'll find my work is well reasoned and supported by facts. Still, at the end of the day, I am an editorial columnist, and as such, I express my opinions.
Well reasoned Jon!
Listen, Mac, your excuse of 'observational' is you condescending in lieu of contemplation. As you wish. I'll not be among your subs. Good day
Friend, should you ever wish for me to read anything you write beyond the first sentence, may I recommend you don't characterize someone unknown to you as a 'hater'. Only weak people use received opinion to influence others. I may try a subsequent post of your's. But should you begin by telling me what someone else is thinking or feeling or even doing and we part our short, almost acquaintance. Good day
Thank you for writing. This is not "received opinion," it is observational and based on the facts in evidence. I hope you'll go back over some posts from the last year and get a sense of what and how I write. If you find it inadequate, I trust you will unsubscribe, but I think you'll find my work is well reasoned and supported by facts. Still, at the end of the day, I am an editorial columnist, and as such, I express my opinions.